Intimate Experiments with the Problem of HIV
I’m in the throes of preparing my manuscript for Routledge on gay sex and HIV prevention in the pharmaceutical and digital context
And I think my aha! moment has finally struck me. My key wager is that science and related knowledge practices should both be guided by, and promote, an embracing of the pleasures some seek in sex.
Because science, too, is best when it feels the risk of its involvement – but also acknowledges its investment in – being transformatively affected by its encounters, experienced as events.
The determining question is the range of feelings one activates in response to such events.
I’m using this proposition to frame a range of social scientific and gay male sexual responses to HIV/AIDS in our digital times. What happens when we treat the sexual and social practices of affected groups as situated experiments and consider how they get articulated with the problems HIV science and policy put forward?
My thinking derives much of its energy from bringing the later work of Foucault on problematisation and ‘bodies and pleasures’ into conversation with A.N. Whitehead’s adventurous definition of events.
For an early experiment with this, see my piece ‘Reluctant Objects’ in the first edition of GLQ this year, 2016.